Comments on: Google South Africa In Trouble With Entelligence And The Competition Commission

By: vMLisa

vMLisa — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:26:55 +0000

Thanks a lot for your fantastic facts just about this post. Can you assist to notice the thesis writing service or an experienced custom dissertation service to purchase the thesis paper at?

By: nC32ELLEN

nC32ELLEN — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:58:06 +0000

The hard working students can read through your article associated with this good post and just purchase the dissertation references at the dissertation writing service.

By: Out of Proportion: Google SA Certification

Out of Proportion: Google SA Certification — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:10:46 +0000

[...] Google SA’s trying to make up for the Entelligence debacle. Either way, once it’s clear who to trust in this online space, maybe the industry will move [...]

By: Recent Links Tagged With "pages" - JabberTags

Recent Links Tagged With "pages" - JabberTags — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:19:33 +0000

[...] public links >> pages Google South Africa In Trouble With Entelligence And The … Saved by zereshka on Thu 09-10-2008 Research Pages Review or �Professors Don�t Read� Saved [...]

By: lol!

lol! — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:43:24 +0000

With the amount of people you’ve screwed over before … all I have to say is “KARMA BABY!”

lololololololol!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:43:19 +0000

It would seem that the email/s were clearly meant to be received by Mr Riley and not forwarded to him by mistake. The content may have been confidential or privileged however in this case since Google had allegedly already, openly told other SA agencies about their intention to service certain ‘named accounts� I fail to see how any contracts have could have been breached.
I have to agree with Phil and Steven…. Angus does appear to be openly perusing any opportunity to discredit Entelligence and Sean Riley. Angus your posts portray your concerns more as an opportunity to settle some personal vendetta than a true concern for professional business practice.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:15:31 +0000

Alright lads, I need to step in. The Angus who posted the previous comments is not the same Angus who works with me at Cerebra. I have nothing to do with this concern, and neither do any of my companies, other than the fact that I found it an interesting and attention-worthy industry development.

Resume your mudslinging, if you so wish…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:58:02 +0000

Funny, I got an email from someone at Google once and the footer read:

This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don’t forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it went to the wrong person. Thanks

So Phil….aren’t they then breaching this ‘contract’?
And Steven…doesn’t Angus work at Cerebra?

By: Steven Thompson

Steven Thompson — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:31:03 +0000

All I can say is good luck to Mr Riley and Entelligence and I hope others come forward as I am sure this was not a isolated incidence.

And to Angus, we know you work at Google!

By: Phil

Phil — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:52:22 +0000

Angus, your board committments obviously don’t warrant much time since your input on any blogs relating to this matter represent a substantial time investment on your part – are you being paid for this?

If Google did do what Entelligence says it did, then surely Entelligence has the right to defend its claims with hard fact? To date, Google has said Entelligence’s claims are ‘without merit’… what does this mean? Why doesn’t Google address each claim in a factual, objective manner? Did they alter CPC without permission? Yes or No? Did they pitch directly for the account – Yes or No? Did Google tell Entelligence that they will prevent them from servicing Yellow Pages so that they can service them directly? Yes or No?

Entelligence’s accusations appear so far fetched that I can understand their need to share hard evidence to support their claims. What is unethical about this? The correspondance wasn’t of a confidential nature – Google has openly told many agencies in SA that they have so called ‘named accounts’ that they want to service directly.

Why would Entelligence attack the Google Brandsh? To what end? Entelligence has merely sought justice against a dominant force in the market place who is abusing their power.