7 Reasons Why Rugby Is Better Than Soccer

I’m a sports lover. I’m absolutely obsessed with cricket and rugby and seldom miss international fixtures, while trying to catch as many provincial matches as possible. When there’s no cricket or rugby to watch I’ll happily waste time taking in whatever is on the telly with the exception of horse racing or showjumping, both of which give me the heebies. Can’t tell you why, they just do.

I watch club and international football selectively but because our national team leaves a little to be desired in terms of recent form and I don’t associate directly with any one Premiership or European club side, it’s not a life or death past time. Besides soccer irritates me, more and more every time I watch it. Especially when I compare the game of rugby and rugby players to their soccer counterparts. Here are seven reasons (seven points for a converted try) why rugby kicks soccer’s ass any day:

  1. The oval ball. Obviously less predictable in bounce and flight than a perfectly round ball, the oval rugby ball tests players’ skill when chasing along the ground, kicking and catching, and consequently introduces a magical element of chance into the game.
  2. Real men. Nothing gets to me more than the melodramatic, prima donna-esque nature of modern professional soccer players. These diving, falling, acting idiots detract from the beautiful game to such a degree that it is downright irritating to watch. Players that dive should be flayed in the streets… or something. Rugby players would rather bleed to death, bones protruding from their limbs, before leaving the field of play. A rugby player who dives will be killed by the other team, so he just doesn’t. Rugby players are gladiators. Tell me the McCaw’s, Smit’s, Sharpe’s, Spies’s and others would not have been generals in great armies. Of courrse they would have :)
  3. Respect for officials. Rugby players respect referees. They don’t push, hold, hug or scream at officials. If an official shows a card, a player leaves the field of pay. In soccer, if the ref shows a card, the players throw a festival on the pitch. It detracts from the quality of the game and wastes time.
  4. Camaraderie. Rugby players are like brothers. If a lock forward from one team picks a fight with the scrummie of another team, the scrummie’s forwards pile in like they’re protecting their wives. Soccer players fight too, BUT THEY FIGHT ON THE SAME SIDE!
  5. Regular scoring. If you see 3 or more goals in a soccer match you’re lucky. The rest of the time players spend their time fixing their hair and diving. Rugby has less on-pitch game time, but it’s not unusual to see in excess of thirty points scored in international games. Plus points can be scored via tries, penalties and drop goals, adding variety and excitement to the game.
  6. The Haka. Ok so I shouldn’t like the Haka (Maouri war dance) as much as I do, being a Springbok fan, but there is something deeply stirring about the All Blacks’ pre-match psychological and physical declaration. I crap myself just watching it on the telly – who knows what it’s like in real life?
  7. We can play rugby. Sorry Bafana Bafana, but you somehow don’t inspire as mcuh confidence in us fans as our rugby boys do, being world champions and all. Twice. Keep working at it though…

Would love to hear from the footballers… Bagley-son!?

Popularity: 13% [?]

Sharing is caring:
  • muti
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • laaik.it
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Ma.gnolia
12 Responses to “7 Reasons Why Rugby Is Better Than Soccer”
  1. [...] Original post here [...]

  2. Smaak this subject as I’m a HUGE Rugby fan and played provincial growing up, though I still enjoy following the premiership.

    in all respect, Sport as a whole should be encouraged everywhere as it lays down the basic foundations of everyday challenges. Golf is a challenge, Rugby is a challenge, soccer is a challenge and even poker is a challenge, whether physical or skill, Sport teaches a person to be the very best he or she can be at something.

    I believe that no matter what the challenge is, always try to be the Tiger Woods of your game!!

    Hope the boks turn it around and give the Kiwis a run for their money!! (thumbs crossed)

    Very nice post Mike! Soccer is a nice sport, but you right… rugby is the “shizzle” and nothing compares!!!! :)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKHtoYbiVPU

    by JP van der Spuy
    on 16. Jun, 2008

  3. Most entertaining – even if that plastered digit of yours causes the odd typo. So the post functions as an IQ test for us as well. ;-)

    ‘Fixing their hair and diving’ hmmm? You betta hire a body guard to avoid having your eyes clawed out.

    As a matter of interest, the Haka ain’t a wardance per se, but rather a deeply affecting (as you’ve experienced) invocation to the Ancestors to be present and make their presence and guidance felt.

    Warmest, C

    by Clive Simpkins
    on 16. Jun, 2008

  4. I totally hear you Mike. A rugby game that ended 6-3 would be considered one of the most boring matches ever, but a soccer game that ends 2-1 is praised as being “thrilling”!

    On the other hand, rugby’s laws are preventing wide-spread popularity. Have you ever watched a game with a newbie and tried to explain why a penalty was just given after a scrum or a ruck (or even just explaining when a ruck starts?). Soccer is painfully simple, with almost no room for confusion in the laws, and so it is easy to follow and start playing. I hope the rugby gods are able to get to that point some how.

    by Andrew Smith
    on 16. Jun, 2008

  5. Nice post. A friend of mine always tells me, “If God wanted us to play rugby, he would have given us round testicles.”

    by Andrew Smit
    on 18. Jun, 2008

  6. I mean soccer, “If God wanted us to play soccder, he would have given us round testicles.”

    by Andrew Smit
    on 18. Jun, 2008

  7. lol

    by JP van der Spuy
    on 18. Jun, 2008

  8. Mike, you strike me as one of those guys who turns the volume up when the Haka is done. I do…it’s awesome.

    And I’m a Bok supporter through and through. It’s as if they save their best Haka for when they play our boys.

    Also, we were the first team to witness the slightly more grotesque version. You know, the one the Pommies cried about and banned from Twickenham.

    by Henre
    on 19. Jun, 2008

  9. [...] 8 Comments on this post… Soccer News Aggregator ” 7 reasons why rugby Is better than Soccer 15 …http://www.mikestopforth.com/2008/06/15/7-reasons-why-rugby-is-better-than-soccer/Read “RE: why most europeans consider baseball boring” at Sports Talk Forum…: Originally Posted by [...]

  10. Perhaps this is the place I can ask for some sensible input – if you were a Pommie rugby & cricket fan/player on tour in SA (Gauteng 5 days/ CT 5 days probably) – what would be the Must-sees? Must-gos? Must-dos?

    by Kari Cousins
    on 07. Apr, 2009

  11. Soccer is an all around better sport. You’ve obviously never played in a soccer game. Diving is no reason to say soccer isn’t as good. I’m sure if one of your rugby players played soccer for a day he would learn to dive as well. Regular scoring is also completely bogus. I’ll admit rugby is a higher scoring game but it is choppy and stops frequently. Soccer flows and there is always excitement whether there is scoring or not, also… the haka? are you serious? its cool but that can’t even begin to be an argument on why rugby is a better sport. finally soccer actually takes skill to play the game in rugby all you really need is a basic knowledge of the rules and anyone can play

    by pele bazil
    on 09. Apr, 2009

  12. for some reason when i read “Tell me the McCaw’s, Smit’s, Sharpe’s, Spies’s and others would not have been generals in great armies.” i envisioned Pierre Spies on D-Day throwing Nazi’s around like rag dolls and clunking them together on the head.

    go bokke

    by Etienne
    on 23. Dec, 2009

Leave a Reply

« Back to text comment