27 Gets a Walloping

Dave Duarte, Carl Spies and I work together in a company called Cerebra. Cerebra has been under the radar but is due to officially launch to the public later this month.

Last year I organised a geek dinner here in Jozi with Stormhoek and others. The geek dinner was a no agenda, no obligation opportunity for geeks to get together, but also for non-geeks to immerse themselves in all things geeky in a safe, welcoming environment. It was a huge success and I decided I wanted to carry it on this year.

We came up with the idea of 27 – a brand for a geek dinner concept here in SA that would be held on the 27th of each month, alternating between Jozi and Cape Town. Seemed like a good idea, and general feedback was enthusiastic and positive.

But then I made the grave mistake of announcing on the existing geek dinner wiki that we would be branding the geek dinner 27 – a collaboration between Cerebra (because we’d be organising them) and Stormhoek (who would continue to support with wine and such). I was pretty comfortable branding the dinner Cerebra, because of the organisational role, and because the geek dinner concept, although open source in its application has always had a marketing slant to it (after all, Stormhoek coined the idea as a marketing campaign).

Two geeks I hold in high regard disagreed wholeheartedly though, saying I was destroying the essence of geek dinner, which could not be owned or run by any corporation, but rather belonged to the community. I agree, but also know that someone has to organise these things, be they barcamps or geek dinners or whatever. I was happy to do that in exchange for some goodwill from the community. Believe me, if I wanted to run geek dinners as a huge commercial marketing initiative I wouldn’t be inviting geeks. I’d be inviting corporate bunnies.

Alas, it seems my trusted friends saw it VERY differently, encouraging me to cut the crap and bullshit and rather take 27 elsewhere.

So I have. Cerebra and Stormhoek will still be running a geek dinner, on the 27th of each month, alternating between Jozi and CT. You can still add your names to a wiki that I’ve put up here. The only difference is that I won’t be treading on the toes of the community who ‘owns’ the existing geek dinner movement that ‘nobody owns’.

The wiki for 27 can be found at 27dinner.pbwiki.com. I’ll be updating it with more info as I get around to it.

Bear in mind this doesn’t affect any other dinners or ad hoc bits and pieces that people are organising. I just want to brand it because I think that’s useful and make it a regular occurrence. It’s still about tech, life, laughter, wine, food, and humans. Nothing changes. I just want you to know that the 27th of every second month, depending on where you live, is booked :)

Popularity: 2% [?]

Sharing is caring:
  • muti
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • laaik.it
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Ma.gnolia
27 Responses to “27 Gets a Walloping”
  1. Ain’t this hugely disappointing? I guess the archetypal Geek would say, ‘We’re not LIKE regular people’. But heck, this coterie’s politiking, spray-urinating on their postage stamp of turf and parochialism are no different after all! Methinks I can now safely brand myself as a Geek since some have been homogenised. But I’ll be one without the paranoia and desperate need to be so different that it makes you simply ‘of the herd’ anyhow. Sies! A pox – oozy ones – on them. ;-)

    by Clive Simpkins
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  2. well this has been a mountain out of a molehill & not sure how it turned into a ball of poo.
    But as those who’ve been to the geekdinners know, I’ve also been organising these splendid dinners.. not about glory, we do it out of pleasure, to connect with others of our kind who think & live their lives in a peculiarly geeky fashion over a hearty dinner & sparking conversation.
    And until now.. it’s been nothing but a joy.

    Mike we all LOVED the 27 idea. simple.
    The co.branding of the event with Stormhoek was irksome because Cerebra is a TECH company. simple.
    There was feedback on the wiki cos the guys didn’t like the Cerebra branding. but we all loved the 27 idea.

    You teach companies the benefit of dealing with negative feedback; so it was odd that you backed out; though I know it’s sometimes sore from those who care for you & are close. It wasn’t a personal attack. It wasn’t an attack on Cerebra.
    ..it was just that we had different opinions on who was branding the event. That’s all.

    I personally adore you and think you are courageous and exceptional… but it doesn’t mean that I think ALL your ideas are winners.
    Would be severely kak to see our little geek community divided over a trifling. South Africa knows division deep within her wounds. Unity among the smart & the fearless is what we strive for.

    (thank you for the call Mike. So sad you felt personally slighted, we’re all here to back each other up, and I will continue to do so for you: you are doing wonders for the industry).
    Hopefully we can map the network together & get our connection up & running sweet again..

    PS. sorry to all who are now witness to the blog version of the soapie drama. Dirty laundry day it is :-P

    by Max Kaizen
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  3. [...] Read: 27 Gets a Walloping [...]

  4. My title is harsh… Apologies… but I just found it kind of humourous that something like this happened outside of the software development arena where it happens very, very often!

    by Stii
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  5. Mike this is an awesome oppurtunity to 1) learn about the how the open source community works 2) embrace wiki technology for all its worth.

    What if… your Enterprise 2.0 solution you have just deployed in BIG Corporate Pty Ltd ;

    Silly example… all employees start using a bespoke intranet del.icio.us like system. Mr CEO sees a truthful company issue being circulated by everyone in his corporation but MR CEO doesn’t understand the issue as he has never experienced that himself. All he is considering is ROI & the bottom line. The bottom line is that the line is very thing.

    Does Mr CEO shoot himself in the foot by shutting down the entire system and only allow management to access it?

    Does Mark Shuttleworth use Ubuntu to own Linux?

    Does Google claim to own the Internet?

    Look at what happened when Google added the Tips above the search results for specific keyword terms pointing to their own products like blogger & picassa etc.. even Matt Cutts disagreed.

    Look at the RSS icon that is being shared by Firefox & IE7. You cannot claim to own anything in open source.

    Wonder what Hugh & Graham Knox think about this?

    I personally think this shows your lack of experience in the open source trenches.

    The Shuttleworth Foundation funded the Schools Linux User Group but did not call it the Shuttleworth Foundation’s school Linux user group.

    Its about the group not the individual/corporation.

    This has nothing to do with you or your company, it is about a concept.

    Does this make things clearer? I’d like to invite you to come along and volunteer with me one day when there will be an event again and see what open source is really about.

    Gekdinners have left me with a similar feeling to watching TEDtalks. When you look at the TEDGlobal Application form you’ll find this just before the submit button: *I will not use my TED attendance to aggressively pitch my company, organization, products or services to other attendees.

    Just my 2.0 cents worth.

    Your Web AddiCT

    by Rafiq Phillips
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  6. Stupid question time – what is the wiki password?

    by Jaxon Rice
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  7. I reckon the geek dinners/networking dinners/drinking parties are awesome ideas, just a pity doesn’t get to see them that often :(
    What about one for us every 6 months ;)

    by Marc Forrest
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  8. Rafiq,

    First of all, I’m downright sad that you question my intentions. Like I said, if I was trying to make money I wouldn’t be inviting geeks.

    I appreciate your impulse to educate me, but am pretty confident I’m doing ok.

    You have made good points, and I appreciate your insight. I made a mistake assuming it was ok to associate Cerebra with the concept, and I have learned. Like I said, 27 won’t be treading on hallowed ‘open source’ turf. Us capitalist pigs shall dwell at another wiki :P

    by Mike
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  9. My hat! This thread looks a lot like the recent TechCrunch UK saga. To quote from blog post titles some of us used, can’t we just make up and be friends?

    by Paul
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  10. So it’s not just the personal bloggers who are susceptible to a bit of misunderstanding and occasional treading on toes. Geeks do it too! Who would have thought: Geeks have egos and feelings and even the odd temper tantrum.

    Let me preface what am I about to say with two things:

    1. I’ve had wine. Which makes me even more theatrical and histrionic (and long-winded it would appear)
    2. I love Mike. I think he is a lovely, sweet, kind-hearted, super guy. Even though he is the complete antithesis of me – about 400 years younger than I am, a happy-clapper and a really good person (i.e. I am a bitchy old shrew). So I might be a leeeeetle biased here.

    Perhaps it wasn’t the right idea to have a branded dinner, (I’m thinking ‘why the fark would it matter’, but what do I know, I am not a Geek), but I am a little disappointed in some of the responses. I honestly don’t think it was necessary to make it personal. Why aim barbs at Mike and his experience or lack thereof? Come on guys, I thought you were above all of that.

    Re the branded thing – I have to say that I find it all slightly amusing. It’s like the surfer sub-culture: all SO very non-conformist, non-materialistic, alternate, individualistic whatever, and yet they ALL wear Billabong and Quicksilver etc. Like I say, who cares whether it is branded or not? Especially with a small, upcoming ‘brand’ that stemmed from the very thing you are trying to create, a collection of like minded people who have a similar passion for the technology. Will having the brand on the dinner REALLY impact the integrity of the events? (Like Mike has that kind of clout!) Will that prostitute the good intentions of friendship, camaraderie and let’s be honest here, a bit of aspiring commercial networking as well.

    But again, as I said, what do I know. If you want to keep it unbranded, then fine. But don’t attack the guy for trying to do what he thought was a good thing. That seems really unfair. Leave that shit for the mommy blogging brigade where we have our little mini drama’s on a daily basis ;-)

    And don’t go breaking up with each other. I’ve just found you all and I am so excited to be an honorary Geek (am way too materialistic / branded / doff to be a true Geek). I want to be invited to more Geek dinners. And I think you are ALL completely divine, if a little odd.

    Now, all of you – go kiss and make up. NOW!!

    by Tertia
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  11. I am with Tertia on this one. After my happy clappy comment I thought I should do a follow up. It is crazy if this dispute fractures the community over the name associated with the geek dinner.

    I dig this community, both coasts, and it should remain a coherent community. I think we are all pretty much on the same page when it comes to promoting the local community and building it into an even stronger and more coherent community. If I am right about this then I think that should be the focus, irrespective of whether it is called the Cerebra geek dinner, the 60s free love geek dinner or the nameless evening meal gathering.

    Make love not war people. And remember the TechCrunch UK saga. History repeats itself.

    by Paul
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  12. Wow! what a heated debate over something so small.
    We could of simply said 27 geek dinner and put on the side sponsored by Stormhoek wine and Cerebra. Anyone who what’s to contribute to the party in terms of organisation, not speaking, gets to add their little sponsor thing like they did on the web2.0 conference .
    Or have something like event organised by …, wine supplied by …, audio and lighting by…, like hollywood :)

    I think when you say it’s a collaboration between x and y, the other people who took part feel a little excluded.
    It’s not only the organizers that make the event, but all the participants.
    Granted I haven’t taken much part in contributing to the organising or speaking at the event. I just sit there and learn and try to act like I know a lot and drink the wine and provide , hopefully intelligent conversation, but isn’t that what the geek dinner is also about apart from the actual speakers.

    by Miguel
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  13. Miguel you’re spot on dude.

    Basically, all you’re saying is that ‘collaborating’ is a better word than ’sponsoring’. I’m glad at least that you don’t get the impression I’m trying to take over the universe with my evil company.

    Bottom line, I stuffed up with the logo and a word. I humbly apologise for that indiscretion.

    by Mike
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  14. Jaxon, the wiki password is: convers8

    by Dave Duarte
    on 10. Jan, 2007

  15. Mike,

    If 27 is something that you have put together, with your time and effort – then do what you want with it.

    For the geeks that want to get value out of it – we can make the choice whether we want to participate or not.

    For anything that needs your time & attention (ie distraction from real work) – then you need to get due benefit.

    Keep it up.

    by Angus Robinson
    on 11. Jan, 2007

  16. Just to boil your bunny a bit more.. :-P

    Uhhm.. what if the 27th is on a Sunday or public holiday ?

    Also, most people are in some form of week-day routine.. Tuesdays are CLUG dinners, Wednesdays are Amobia meetings..

    This is like “First Tuesday” with a bug in the logic (-:

    I’d rather do a monthly local (cpt) dinner and then once in a blue moon (maybe 6mnts) try inspire a group of people to make the effort to travel to Jhb.. to meet our smog-munching-mine-heap-loving-geek-brothers at a “big” event.

    by Joe
    on 11. Jan, 2007

  17. Oh Miguel.. you wise fellow!! you ARE going to have a decent convo with me at the next geekdinner (under whatever crazy morphing guise it happens to be under at the time) for goodness sake.
    Truth is: does require a little bit of effort to get them together and Dave, Mike & I would LOVE you guys to get more involved. For me, it’s just a pleasure (but then I seriously get off on hanging with genius). But the more the merrier – let’s dive in like true open sourcers and tweak the original coding as we see fit.
    Mike scored a one out of two hit rate on his latest tweaks – 27: what a cooking idea! but the rebranding: em, pretty swak1. That’s innovation for you!
    We’d be amped for crazy ideas, sponsorships, volunteer missions, prizes, venue suggestions, a new telecoms infrastructure :-P whatever.

    So: bottomline – geekdinner (perpetual beta) is a jol & we want more of it. Geekcrew lets fire up our synapses and come up with some cooking suggestions (wherever you are in the country – captain Chris can always fly us there!)
    Increase the peace
    Maximize the fun!

    by Max Kaizen
    on 11. Jan, 2007

  18. I’ll jump on the bandwagon here and say I’m with Max, Paul, Angus and Miguel on this one. Even if I was able to attend 27’s I wouldn’t give rocks if they were sponsored/collaborated/hosted by any particular company.

    As long as the people are cool, and conversation is good- I would be there. If someone is going to go to all the effort to organize something, surely it is only fair that they take the credit for it.

    I doubt for one minute that Mike, Dave, and Carl had any intention of hijacking the community, they just enjoyed the geekdinners and wanted them to happen more often- and that takes planning/time/money/etc. Keep it up guys, maybe one day I’ll be able to attend.

    by Grant
    on 11. Jan, 2007

  19. [...] M PS. for our local geekcrews who saw a bit of the lab blowing up: please don’t be concerned: we may have been a bit shaken, y’all a bit stirred, but we’re going to have an excellent year of innovation and BONDing in the SA geek community.. and Dave, Mike & I will continue to organise geekgatherings (any assistance ALWAYS welcomed!! it IS opensource after all) Damn…respect if you made it through this long post! you must be a geek 8-) ! if (typeof window.Delicious == “undefined”) window.Delicious = {}; Delicious.BLOGBADGE_DEFAULT_CLASS = ‘delicious-blogbadge-line’; [...]

  20. mike,
    with a bit of luck I’ll be in SA on the 27th of April. If it is a jozi session, I’d love to pop by, even if you are cobranding it, and there are opensaucers present.

    Good to see you in the social media google group.

    Greetings from an oddly warm Germany.
    Thomas

    by Thomas Otter
    on 12. Jan, 2007

  21. [...] From the creators of Cerebra comes 27. “27 is a get together, held on the 27th day of each month for geeks, marketers, entrepreneurs, writers, media practitioners, speakers – well, just about anybody who is keen – to share ideas and news and opinions over food and drink. Alternating between Jozi and Cape Town, 27 is open to anyone who wants to attend (and/or contribute).” [...]

  22. How fucked up! This whole situation is very sad indeed. Fair play to you Mike, organise the event, brand it any way you want, and to hell with the purists.

    You can’t please everyone, there’s always going to be someone too punk rock for Punk Rock…!

    by Rich...!
    on 14. Jan, 2007

  23. [...] When you thought 27 was being walloped the following comment was left: I’d like to invite you to come along and volunteer with me one day when there will be an event again and see what open source is really about. [...]

    by » Local Open Source Brilliance
    on 18. Feb, 2007

  24. Wow, in Afrikaans we have an expression for all the people who have commented so far…

    “Ou tannies met nat broeke”

    by Jonathan Carter
    on 19. Feb, 2007

  25. Pfffffff – not really ’smart’ to even give the impression of ‘hi-jacking’ something that is supposed to be informal, open and fun in the first place…

    So, here’s the concept: companies can sponsor a Geekdinner – their logo is plastered all over the Wiki, emails, invitations, coasters, glasses and toiletpaper – for that particular date\event only – they pay X amount (upfront) and they get Y tickets\seats for their clients\spouses\bankers. They are allowed to distribute some ‘gadgets’ (every geek needs a free pen), plus they get the opening-presentation\speech on any topic they like (they only know one topic anyway).

    The next dinner might be sponsored by another company under the same conditions; if there is a mogul out there, he might even sponsor 3 dinners for the price of 2!

    The money goes into a trust(!) fund to cover expenses – not sure if a non-existing entity can get sponsor money, but then maybe a not-for-profit can be established?

    If that is too much effort, well, just carry on and have fun. And possibly some ‘rifts’, every now & then :-)

    by Jasper
    on 26. Feb, 2007

  26. [...] [Verse 3] Everybody’s posts read the same, commercialize the game Reminiscin’ when it wasn’t all business If it got where it started So we all gather here for the dearly departed Blogger since a web-toddler Mike Stopforth became a man then a mobster If the guys let me get my last post on the blog R.I.P., we donate our ad revenue to CLUG Went from only html to XML From ‘what is RSS?’ to feedburner From default themes to custom-built skins From 5 mintue design to winning an Apple TV I’m lookin’ over my shoulder It’s about eighty Linkedin Connections that showed up And they came to show love Fully-booked 27Dinner and the wikis closed shut [...]

  27. Call a flame, by it’s name, a flame. Yes I flame too….

    The flames are flying on this Monday morning.
    Yes, Your Web AddiCT(s); flame too. What exactly is a flame and how is flaming used when blogging?
    What is a flame? A flame is an intentionally crude or abusive email message or blog post. Rule: Don’…

    by Web AddiCT(s);
    on 21. Jul, 2008

Leave a Reply

« Back to text comment