<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snowball 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur  &#124;  Writer  &#124;  Speaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:23:47 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ElisabettaNa23</title>
		<link>http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/comment-page-1/#comment-111688</link>
		<dc:creator>ElisabettaNa23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/#comment-111688</guid>
		<description>I guess that we must remember if choose the professional essays writing company, this will be a chance to have the really hot ideas about this good post and  purchase the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.primewritings.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;quality custom essay&lt;/a&gt; connecting with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.primewritings.com/how-it-works.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;how it works&lt;/a&gt;. Hence, that’s good choice. Try it now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that we must remember if choose the professional essays writing company, this will be a chance to have the really hot ideas about this good post and  purchase the <a href="http://www.primewritings.com" rel="nofollow">quality custom essay</a> connecting with <a href="http://www.primewritings.com/how-it-works.php" rel="nofollow">how it works</a>. Hence, that’s good choice. Try it now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Faves Tagged With "andrewmcafee" : MyNetFaves</title>
		<link>http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/comment-page-1/#comment-78660</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Faves Tagged With "andrewmcafee" : MyNetFaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/#comment-78660</guid>
		<description>[...] links &gt;&gt; andrewmcafee    Expert Guides updates First saved by KeithGillette &#124; 3 days ago      Snowball 2.0 First saved by lucyq &#124; 14 days ago      Enterprise 2.0 Leaders Amongst 100 Most Influential in IT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] links &gt;&gt; andrewmcafee    Expert Guides updates First saved by KeithGillette | 3 days ago      Snowball 2.0 First saved by lucyq | 14 days ago      Enterprise 2.0 Leaders Amongst 100 Most Influential in IT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvard Business School Publishes Wikipedia Case &#124; Mike Stopforth</title>
		<link>http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/comment-page-1/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Business School Publishes Wikipedia Case &#124; Mike Stopforth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>[...] I was quickly put in my place though, as my attempt to add the new article had not clearly followed the many rules and guidelines determined by Wikipedia administrators. Some of these rules and regulations are really important, but in this case, given the evidence, it all seemed rather excessive. I wrote about it here. The article was subsequently put of for deletion, then voted upon, the fascinating conversation behind which is documented here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was quickly put in my place though, as my attempt to add the new article had not clearly followed the many rules and guidelines determined by Wikipedia administrators. Some of these rules and regulations are really important, but in this case, given the evidence, it all seemed rather excessive. I wrote about it here. The article was subsequently put of for deletion, then voted upon, the fascinating conversation behind which is documented here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stopforth &#187; Social Computing in the Enterprise</title>
		<link>http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stopforth &#187; Social Computing in the Enterprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>[...] David and I spoke before in the midst of the Enterprise 2.0 vs. Wikipedia debacle - he&#8217;s a great guy and a leading thinker in the Enterprise 2.0 space.  Sharing is caring:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where you can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David and I spoke before in the midst of the Enterprise 2.0 vs. Wikipedia debacle &#8211; he&#8217;s a great guy and a leading thinker in the Enterprise 2.0 space.  Sharing is caring:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where you can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vendorprisey</title>
		<link>http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Vendorprisey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Stopforth certainly started something with his wikipedia entry for Enterprise 2.0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Stopforth certainly started something with his wikipedia entry for Enterprise 2.0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Otter</title>
		<link>http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Otter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Mike,
Glad you got this ball rolling, even if the reaction surprised us all. (Good to see that South Africans are leading the charge)

The discussion continues over on Wikipedia. It is worth following the deletion round two dialogue. It seems that &quot;we&quot; arent going to win this one. (perhaps in the sort term it should be a sub theme on web 2.0 section, but this wouldnt be my first choice)

Whether the Wikipedians allow us an entry or not is really a moot point though. enterprise 2.0, or whatever it ends up being called, is here to stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
Glad you got this ball rolling, even if the reaction surprised us all. (Good to see that South Africans are leading the charge)</p>
<p>The discussion continues over on Wikipedia. It is worth following the deletion round two dialogue. It seems that &#8220;we&#8221; arent going to win this one. (perhaps in the sort term it should be a sub theme on web 2.0 section, but this wouldnt be my first choice)</p>
<p>Whether the Wikipedians allow us an entry or not is really a moot point though. enterprise 2.0, or whatever it ends up being called, is here to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Certainty</title>
		<link>http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Certainty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikestopforth.com/2006/08/22/snowball-20/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Daily Links 2006-08-23...&lt;/strong&gt;

Enterprise Software is (still) Not Dead Zoli comments on the rumored death of enterprise software: &quot;With almost predictable regularity we&#039;re seeing software obituaries popping up just about every month: the only variation in the theme is what&#039;s ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Daily Links 2006-08-23&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Enterprise Software is (still) Not Dead Zoli comments on the rumored death of enterprise software: &quot;With almost predictable regularity we&#8217;re seeing software obituaries popping up just about every month: the only variation in the theme is what&#8217;s &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
