Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 Evolution

By: The Next Step For Social Media | Mike Stopforth

The Next Step For Social Media | Mike Stopforth — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:02:39 +0000

[...] social platforms, tools and technologies behind the corporate firewall (a school of thought dubbed Enterprise 2.0) and traditional ERP vendors like Microsoft, SAP, IBM and Oracle are actively incorporating social [...]

By: Mike Stopforth » Snowball 2.0

Mike Stopforth » Snowball 2.0 — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:59:47 +0000

[...] Now I’ve had my rant on the subject. I’m just keen to trace the events that have led to a mini storm in a teacup and ironically enough, more publicity for the term Enterprise 2.0 than I’d ever hoped for or imagined. [...]

By: The Ponderings of Woodrow

The Ponderings of Woodrow — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:21:45 +0000

The word “Enterprise”…the Rodney Dangerfield of the new media…

Why is it that enterprise-related news, discussions and analysis in the blogosphere takes such a backseat to the latest over-funded me too VC-backed consumer startup that’s got about as much chance of generating a positive IRR as I do of…

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:50:12 +0000

I’m with you Rod. I think getting pedantic about the semantics won’t help anyone – it’s a phrase that is gaining recognition and just like Web 2.0, will have slightly different meanings for different people.

Bought and downloaded the article and thoroughly enjoyed it. Will be compiling a list of E2.0 references at this blog soon.

By: Rod Boothby

Rod Boothby — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:30:38 +0000

What is with non-experts at Wikipedia nuking other people’s articles?

I really like Andrew McAfee’s Enterprise 2.0 term. It was widely publicized as the title in an article that was published in the MIT Sloan Management Review.

http://sloanreview.mit.edu/smr/issue/2006/spring/06/

What more do you need to consider it a major topic of general interest?